The Macroeconomic Fallout of Trumps Tariff Proposals NAFTA

The Macroeconomic Fallout of Trumps Tariff Proposals NAFTA

• 1. Moody’s Analytics The Macroeconomic Fallout of Trump’s Tariff Proposals October 2024 1 ANALYSIS OCTOBER 2024 AUTHORS Mark Zandi Mark.Zandi@moodys.com Chief Economist Brendan LaCerda Brendan.LaCerda@moodys.com Director/Senior Economist Justin Begley Justin.Begley@moodys.com Economist ABOUT Please attribute information in this document to Moody’s Analytics, which is a division within Moody’s that is separate from Moody’s Ratings. Accordingly, the viewpoints expressed herein do not reflect those of Moody’s Ratings. CONTACT US Email helpeconomy@moodys.com U.S./Canada +1.866.275.3266 EMEA +44.20.7772.5454 (London) +420.234.747.505 (Prague) Asia/Pacific +852.3551.3077 All Others +1.610.235.5299 Web www.economy.com The Macroeconomic Fallout of Trump’s Tariff Proposals The U.S. presidential election is just a few weeks away, and former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris are relentlessly campaigning to draw in the few remaining undecided voters. Both are focusing their messaging on the economy with Trump vowing to bring down prices, cut taxes, and protect domestic manufacturing, while Harris is making appeals to the lower and middle class and small businesses, and promising to address the housing shortage and support the nation’s manufacturing base.

• 2. The Macroeconomic Fallout of Trump’s Tariff Proposals BY MARK ZANDI, BRENDAN LACERDA AND JUSTIN BEGLEY The U.S. presidential election is just a few weeks away, and former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris are relentlessly campaigning to draw in the few remaining undecided voters. Both are focusing their messaging on the economy with Trump vowing to bring down prices, cut taxes, and protect domestic manufacturing, while Harris is making appeals to the lower and middle class and small businesses, and promising to address the housing shortage and support the nation’s manufacturing base. Trade policy is key to Trump’s policy agenda. He has proposed a 10% universal tariff on U.S. imports, an effort to protect goods-producing industries domestically and raise revenues for the federal government. He has also floated a higher 60% tariff on goods originating in China and a full decoupling from that nation for national security purposes. Together, these would raise the effective tariff rate from its current 3% to a historically high 19% (see Chart 1). ASSUMPTIONS We use the Moody’s Analytics U.S. macro model to assess the economic consequences of Trump’s tariff proposal. Our baseline (most likely) forecast assumes that Harris wins the election, Republicans win a majority in the Senate, and Democrats secure a majority in the House, resulting mostly in legislative gridlock. Sources: Department of Commerce, World Bank, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, Moody’s Analytics 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93 97 01 05 09 13 17 21 U.S. Euro area Effective tariff rate*, % *Import duty revenues as share of total goods imports Chart 1: Trump Tariffs Would Significantly Raise the Effective Tariff Rate Moody’s Analytics The Macroeconomic Fallout of Trump’s Tariff Proposals October 2024 2

• 3. In contrast to our previous election scenarios, where we incorporate the candidates’ entire platforms, here we isolate the effects of Trump’s proposed tariff policies. Of Trump’s various campaign promises, his trade policy is the most likely to be implemented, since the president has near-complete authority to unilaterally make foreign policy decisions. We assume Trump does not follow through on his 60% tariff promise on Chinese imports. Instead, we assume a uniform import levy of 10% on all countries. As in the trade wars during Trump’s first term, we anticipate many U.S. trading partners will respond with higher tariffs of their own on U.S. goods they are importing. To determine the magnitude of the retaliatory tariffs, we rely on the expert judgment of our country economists, who weigh a wide range of economic, political and geopolitical factors (see Table 1). SCOPE AND SCALE The tariff increases Trump imposed in his first term were limited. At their peak in 2019, they impacted about $300 billion in goods, equal to 10% of U.S. imports, and were limited to specific products, mostly coming from China. They nonetheless did measurable economic damage, particularly to the agriculture, manufacturing and transportation industries. A tariff increase covering nearly all goods imports, as Trump has proposed, goes far beyond any previous action. Goods imports account for more than $3 trillion, or more than 10% of U.S. domestic demand, suggesting that more than a tenth of consumer goods will face price hikes, since higher import prices give domestic producers greater power to raise their own prices (see Chart 2). Moreover, the magnitude of the economic effects of Trump’s tariff proposal intensify as trade partners’ retaliation escalates. Country economists at Moody’s Analytics assess that most nations will respond to the 10% tariff by placing tariffs on U.S. exports, which account for Trade volume measures, %, share of domestic demand Chart 2: Scope and Scale of Tariff Impact Share of U.S. imports by goods, 2023 Sources: BEA, Moody’s Analytics 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 20 Imports: goods Imports: services Exports: goods Exports: services Food products 6.8% Mineral products (incl oil) 10.4% Chemicals, plastics, rubbers 15.1% Wood and paper 2.2% Textiles and apparel Stone and glass 7.1% 0.9% Metals (incl. precious) 8.9% Machines (ex transpo.) 29.1% Transportation 11.1% Other 8.4% Moody’s Analytics The Macroeconomic Fallout of Trump’s Tariff Proposals October 2024 3

• 4. more than 7% of domestic demand. Of the countries that retaliate, China and Mexico are assumed to respond in kind with a similar tariff rate, while the European Union places a 7% tariff on imports from the U.S. Several other countries—such as Canada and Brazil—will retaliate but to a smaller degree. Economies with little to no trade relationship with the U.S. and those more vulnerable to trade disruptions will not retaliate (see Chart 3). MACROECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES Trump’s proposed tariff policy raises costs for businesses and in turn weighs on growth and productivity. The tariffs accelerate inflation as businesses pass much of their higher costs to consumers. Growth in core producer prices, which excludes food and energy, quickly accelerates with the year-over-year rate rising to its highest since the third quarter of 2022, when inflation was near its cycle peak. At its peak impact, the 10% universal tariff is projected to raise the year-ago rate of growth in core producer prices by 6.1 percentage points above our baseline forecast. Firms do not bear the full weight of the tariff, however, and are able to pass some of their increased cost of goods down to consumers. As a result, annual growth in core consumer price inflation is projected to rise 1.1 percentage point above the baseline forecast at its peak, reversing much of the recent progress made on quelling inflation (see Chart 4). As inflation accelerates, consumers pull back on spending and businesses on investment. Exports also fall more than imports because of a combination of trade disruptions hurting supply chains, retaliation from major trade partners, and a stronger U.S. dollar. As a result, the trade deficit widens and weighs on real GDP. Together, these cause the U.S. economy to slip into a mild and brief technical recession by mid- to late 2025, and the economy ends up on a weaker path as a result (see Chart 5). Source: Moody’s Analytics Chart 3: Global Retaliation to Higher U.S. Tariffs Change in tariff rate on goods imported from the U.S. >7% 7% >0 to <7 0% Moody’s Analytics The Macroeconomic Fallout of Trump’s Tariff Proposals October 2024 4

• 5. The economic contraction leads employers to reduce hiring and lay off workers. The unemployment rate peaks at 5.3% in the third quarter of 2026, 1.3 percentage points above the baseline. Industries that disproportionately rely on imports for inputs, such as construction and manufacturing, will take the greatest hit, though all industries are worse off in terms of total employment due to broader weakness in the economy (see Charts 6 and 7). Sources: BLS, Moody’s Analytics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Trump Tariff Scenario May baseline Core consumer price index, % change yr ago Core producer price index, % change yr ago Chart 4: Tariffs Will Push Up Inflation on Consumers and Producers… 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Trump Tariff Scenario May baseline Sources: BEA, Moody’s Analytics 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Trump Tariff Scenario May baseline Real GDP, $ tril, SAAR Chart 5: …As the Economy Enters a Short and Mild Recession -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Trump Tariff Scenario May baseline Moody’s Analytics The Macroeconomic Fallout of Trump’s Tariff Proposals October 2024 5

• 6. Higher inflation moves the Federal Reserve to slow the pace of its interest rate reductions. The Federal Open Market Committee began loosening monetary policy in September with a 50-basis point rate cut, citing progress on returning inflation back to target and a renewed focus on its dual mandate of stable prices and maximum employment. Higher tariffs, however, shift the balance of risks back toward inflation, so the Fed allows unemployment to rise by keeping the fed funds rate higher for longer to bring inflation back to 2% (see Chart 8). Sources: BLS, Moody’s Analytics -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 May baseline Trump Tariff Scenario Nonfarm payrolls, total additions, 2025-2028, ths Chart 7: Import-Sensitive Industries Will Take the Biggest Hit Total payroll impact May baseline: +2.6 mil Trump Tariff Scenario: -0.9 mil Sources: BLS, Moody’s Analytics 3 4 5 6 7 8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Trump Tariff Scenario May baseline *13% peak in 2020Q2 Unemployment rate, % Chart 6: New Unemployment Concerns Moody’s Analytics The Macroeconomic Fallout of Trump’s Tariff Proposals October 2024 6

• 7. Higher interest rates put additional pressure on the federal budget deficit, as interest outlays rise. The federal government’s interest expense has risen nearly 40% over the past year as a result of higher coupon rates on U.S. Treasury securities, which were driven up by the Fed’s monetary policy. Tighter Fed policy stemming from higher tariffs will result in more expensive borrowing by the federal government, pushing interest outlays well above defense spending by the end of Trump’s second term and causing the federal interest expense-to-GDP ratio to rise to its highest since the late 1990s. Additional spending on interest expenses increases the pressure on the federal budget deficit and debt. Automatic stabilizers from the federal government due to kick in as the economy enters a downturn will expand the budget deficit further. As a result, the increased revenue from tariffs—estimated to be around $319 billion over Trump’s four-year term—will not be enough to offset the estimated $776 billion increase in federal government spending. Consequently, the federal budget deficit widens to about -6% of nominal GDP compared with about -5% in the baseline and the debt-to-GDP ratio surpasses 110% by the end of Trump’s time in office compared with our baseline forecast of 105% (see Chart 9). SHAKY MARKETS AND CONFIDENCE Trump’s tariff proposal will also inject additional uncertainty into the economy that will be seen both in financial markets and among consumers. Uncertainty regarding a global trade war emanating from the U.S., disruptions to trade flows and supply chains, higher inflation, higher interest rates, and an ensuing recession will shake investor confidence. As a result, stock market volatility will spike to roughly where it was when inflation peaked in mid-2022 and a selloff will commence, resulting in weaker stock prices than in the baseline. Larger budget deficits, a higher federal debt burden, and increased policy uncertainty will also push longer-dated Treasury yields higher (see Chart 10). Sources: U.S. Treasury, BEA, Moody’s Analytics Effective federal funds rate, % Federal interest outlays, % of nominal GDP Chart 8: Higher Interest Rates From Inflation Spike Drive Up Interest Costs... 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Trump Tariff Scenario May baseline 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Trump Tariff Scenario May baseline Moody’s Analytics The Macroeconomic Fallout of Trump’s Tariff Proposals October 2024 7

• 8. Anxiety among consumers will also mount as prices rise and the economy dips into a recession. Consumer confidence dives as a result and remains below the long-run average through the remainder of Trump’s term (see Chart 11). Sources: U.S. Treasury, BEA, Moody’s Analytics 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Trump Tariff Scenario May baseline Federal budget deficit, % of nominal GDP Federal debt held by the public, % of nominal GDP Chart 9: …Putting Further Stress on the U.S. Fiscal Situation -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Trump Tariff Scenario May baseline -19% low Sources: S&P, Federal Reserve, Moody’s Analytics S&P 500 Chart 10: Expect Increased Market Volatility and Higher Long-Term Rates… 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Index, Trump Tariff Scenario (L) Index, May baseline (L) Volatility index, May baseline (R) Volatility index, Trump Tariff Scenario (R) 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Trump Tariff Scenario May baseline 10-yr Treasury yield, % Moody’s Analytics The Macroeconomic Fallout of Trump’s Tariff Proposals October 2024 8

• 9. GLOBAL IMPACT The global economy will not be spared from the higher tariffs levied by Trump. The ensuing trade war will result in a weaker global economy as major U.S. trading partners’ economies shrink. However, the magnitude of the economic shock from Trump’s tariffs for each country depends on how linked it is with the U.S. in terms of trade and the degree of retaliation. Even so, the U.S. will face the largest adverse impact because of its central role in sparking the ensuing trade war (see Chart 12). Sources: The Conference Board, Moody’s Analytics Consumer confidence, 1985=100 Chart 11: …And Weaker Consumer Sentiment 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Trump Tariff Scenario May baseline Long-run avg Source: Moody’s Analytics Real GDP by country, Republican Sweep scenario, devation from baseline forecast, ppts Chart 12: Global Impact of Trump Tariffs -4 -3 -2 -1 0 Mexico China U.S. Brazil Japan Canada U.K. EU 2025 2026 Moody’s Analytics The Macroeconomic Fallout of Trump’s Tariff Proposals October 2024 9

• 10. Table 1: Economic Outlook Under Trump’s 10% Tariff Proposal 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2016-2020 2020-2024 2024-2028 Real GDP Avg annual growth Baseline, 2017$ bil 22,942.0 23,342.2 23,786.8 24,309.5 24,883.5 % change 2.5 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.4 1.4 3.2 2.1 Trump Tariff Scenario, 2017$ bil 22,942.0 23,098.6 23,115.2 23,471.4 23,984.1 % change 2.5 0.7 0.1 1.5 2.2 1.4 3.2 1.1 Difference from Baseline, % 0.0 -1.0 -2.8 -3.4 -3.6 Nonfarm employment Baseline, mil 158.5 159.6 160.1 160.6 161.1 Change, ths 2,451.5 1,042.5 542.4 494.1 524.1 -0.4 2.8 0.4 Trump Tariff Scenario, mil 158.5 158.6 157.2 157.0 157.6 Change, ths 2,451.5 111.9 -1,424.6 -164.3 561.2 -0.4 2.8 -0.1 Difference from Baseline, ths 0 -931 -2,898 -3,556 -3,519 Avg Unemployment rate Baseline, % 4.0 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.9 4.0 Trump Tariff Scenario, % 4.0 4.5 5.2 5.1 4.9 5.0 4.9 4.7 Difference from Baseline, ppt 0.0 0.5 1.2 1.1 0.9 Labor force participation rate Baseline, % 62.7 62.7 62.5 62.5 62.4 62.7 62.4 62.3 Trump Tariff Scenario, % 62.7 62.6 62.4 62.1 61.9 62.7 62.2 62.3 Difference from Baseline, ppt 0.0 -0.0 -0.1 -0.4 -0.5 Real disposable income per household Avg annual growth Baseline, 2017$ bil 130,882 132,300 133,933 136,069 138,423 % change 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.7 3.6 -0.0 1.4 Trump Tariff Scenario, 2017$ bil 130,882 131,083 131,284 132,465 134,260 % change 1.2 0.2 0.2 0.9 1.4 3.6 -0.0 0.6 Difference from Baseline, % 0.0 -0.9 -2.0 -2.6 -3.0 FHFA House Price Index Baseline, index 421.6 427.5 432.6 440.2 450.5 % change 5.0 1.4 1.2 1.8 2.3 6.3 10.0 1.7 Trump Tariff Scenario, index 421.6 427.3 434.0 441.6 449.5 % change 5.0 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.8 6.3 10.0 1.6 Difference from Baseline, % 0.0 -0.0 0.3 0.3 -0.2 Consumer Price Index Baseline, % change yr ago 3.0 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 1.9 4.9 2.3 Trump Tariff Scenario, % change 3.0 3.3 2.8 2.1 2.1 1.9 4.9 2.6 Difference from Baseline, ppt 0.0 0.9 0.5 -0.1 -0.1 Core CPI Baseline, % change yr ago 3.4 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.0 4.5 2.4 Trump Tariff Scenario, % change 3.4 3.3 3.1 2.3 2.2 2.0 4.5 2.7 Difference from Baseline, ppt 0.0 0.7 0.6 0.0 -0.0 S&P Stock Price Index Baseline, index 5,198.8 5,367.4 5,600.7 5,943.3 6,284.5 % change 21.3 3.2 4.3 6.1 5.7 11.4 12.7 4.9 Trump Tariff Scenario, index 5,198.8 5,181.7 5,293.3 5,578.7 5,866.0 % change 21.3 -0.3 2.2 5.4 5.1 11.4 12.7 3.1 Difference from Baseline, % -0.0 -3.5 -5.5 -6.1 -6.7 Moody’s Analytics The Macroeconomic Fallout of Trump’s Tariff Proposals October 2024 10

• 11. Table 1: Economic Outlook Under Trump’s 10% Tariff Proposal (Cont.) 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2016-2020 2020-2024 2024-2028 Broad dollar index Baseline, index 118.7 112.4 111.4 111.0 110.7 % change -1.5 -5.3 -0.8 -0.4 -0.3 1.0 0.2 -1.7 Trump Tariff Scenario, index 118.7 114.1 114.2 115.5 116.9 % change -1.5 -3.9 0.1 1.1 1.2 1.0 0.2 -0.4 Difference from Baseline, % 0.0 1.5 2.5 4.0 5.6 Corporate profits after taxes Baseline, $ bil 3,209.2 3,138.1 3,148.7 3,287.7 3,476.2 % change 7.9 -2.2 0.3 4.4 5.7 4.1 10.1 2.0 Trump Tariff Scenario, $ bil 3,209.2 2,861.0 2,861.9 3,027.5 3,234.2 % change 7.9 -10.9 0.0 5.8 6.8 4.1 10.1 0.2 Difference from Baseline, % -0.0 -8.8 -9.1 -7.9 -7.0 Avg Federal funds rate Baseline, % 5.2 4.3 3.3 2.9 2.9 1.2 2.5 3.7 Trump Tariff Scenario, % 5.2 4.7 3.6 3.0 2.9 Difference from Baseline, ppt 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 10-yr Treasury yield Baseline, % 4.3 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.7 4.1 Trump Tariff Scenario, % 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.4 2.0 2.7 4.3 Difference from Baseline, ppt 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 Federal budget deficit Baseline, $ bil -1,550.1 -1,582.2 -1,583.4 -1,649.0 -1,779.0 % of GDP -5.4 -5.3 -5.1 -5.1 -5.3 -6.2 -8.8 -5.2 Trump Tariff Scenario, $ bil -1,550.1 -1,540.7 -1,721.0 -1,844.3 -1,930.2 % of GDP -5.4 -5.2 -5.7 -5.9 -5.9 -6.2 -8.8 -5.6 Difference from Baseline, % 0.0 -2.6 8.7 11.8 8.5 Federal debt-to-GDP ratio Baseline, % 99.0 100.3 102.0 103.4 104.9 82.3 98.4 101.9 Trump Tariff Scenario, % 99.0 103.7 107.3 109.8 111.8 82.3 98.4 106.3 Difference from Baseline, ppt 0.0 3.4 5.3 6.4 6.9 Sources: BEA, BLS, Census Bureau, Treasury, Federal Reserve, S&P, FHFA, Moody’s Analytics *Differences from baseline may appear inexact due to rounding. Moody’s Analytics The Macroeconomic Fallout of Trump’s Tariff Proposals October 2024 11

• 12. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Mark Zandi is chief economist of Moody’s Analytics, where he directs economic research. Moody’s Analytics, a subsidiary of Moody’s Corp., is a leading provider of economic research, data and analytical tools. Dr. Zandi is a cofounder of Economy.com, which Moody’s purchased in 2005. Dr. Zandi is on the board of directors of MGIC, the largest private mortgage insurance company in the U.S., and is the lead director of PolicyMap, a data visualisation and analytics company, which is used by policymakers and commercial businesses. He is a trusted adviser to policymakers and an influential source of economic analysis for businesses, journalists and the public. Dr. Zandi frequently testifies before Congress and conducts regular briefings on the economy for corporate boards, trade associations, and policymakers at all levels. Dr. Zandi is the author of Paying the Price: Ending the Great Recession and Beginning a New American Century, which provides an assessment of the monetary and fiscal policy response to the Great Recession. His other book, Financial Shock: A 360° Look at the Subprime Mortgage Implosion, and How to Avoid the Next Financial Crisis, is described by The New York Times as the “clearest guide” to the financial crisis. Dr. Zandi is host of the Inside Economics podcast. Dr. Zandi earned his BS from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Brendan LaCerda is a director and senior economist with Moody’s Analytics. Brendan serves as the lead analyst for the Canadian economic forecast. His primary responsibilities also include the development and improvement of country forecast models. His research is primarily focused on international macroeconomics, healthcare and fiscal policy. Before joining Moody’s Analytics, Brendan worked as a senior economist with IHS Global Insight’s U.S. Macroeconomic Service. Brendan received his PhD in economics from the University of Virginia. He pursued his undergraduate education at the London School of Economics and the University of Notre Dame, where he graduated with a BA in economics and mathematics. Justin Begley is a U.S.-based economist at Moody’s Analytics. He covers the economies of Minnesota, Alabama, Wyoming, and several U.S. metro areas. His research focuses on U.S. fiscal policy, geopolitical risk, and the U.S. labor market. He also works on developing models to forecast high-frequency data of the U.S. economy and is a regular contributor to Economic View. Prior to joining Moody’s Analytics, Justin held fellowships at Florida State University and in political economy at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. Justin holds a master’s of science in economics from Florida State University and a bachelor’s degree in finance and economics from Canisius College. Moody’s Analytics The Macroeconomic Fallout of Trump’s Tariff Proposals October 2024 12

• 13. About Moody’s Analytics In an increasingly interconnected and complex operating environment, organizations face challenges decoding the intricacies of the global economy. Moody’s Analytics Economics team delivers timely and in-depth data, forecasts and analysis of the global economy’s latest developments and trends—empowering organizations and policymakers to identify and manage risks, seize new growth opportunities, respond to geopolitical threats, and thrive in an everevolving landscape. The Economics team has more than 35 years of dedicated experience in economic forecasting and research. Leveraging our team’s global coverage and local expertise, our economists provide unrivalled insight on pivotal economic topics, including labor markets, housing and consumer spending, among others, across the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, and APAC. We also provide real-time monitoring of economic indicators, scenario analysis, and thought leadership on critical themes such as monetary and fiscal policy and sovereign risk—all of which support decision makers and policymakers in strategic planning, product and sales forecasting, stress testing, credit risk management, and investment decisions. By combining economic modeling, expansive data resources, and innovative technology solutions, we equip business leaders with critical insights to navigate the complexities of an ever-changing economic landscape. Recognized for our industry-leading solutions and commitment to quality, client service, and integrity, more than 1,000 organizations worldwide—including multinational corporations, governments, financial institutions, real estate firms, and professional investors— trust us to help them turn today’s risks into tomorrow’s opportunities. Learn how Moody’s Analytics can help drive your success at www.economy.com DISCLAIMER: Please attribute information in this document to Moody’s Analytics, which is a division within Moody’s that is separate from Moody’s Ratings. Accordingly, the viewpoints expressed herein do not reflect those of Moody’s Ratings.

• 14. © 2024 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE THEIR CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION PUBLISHED OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “MATERIALS”) MAY INCLUDE SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE APPLICABLE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S MATERIALS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S MATERIALS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND MATERIALS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND MATERIALS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND MATERIALS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES OR OTHERWISE MAKES AVAILABLE ITS MATERIALS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND MATERIALS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR MATERIALS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. FOR CLARITY, NO INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN MAY BE USED TO DEVELOP, IMPROVE, TRAIN OR RETRAIN ANY SOFTWARE PROGRAM OR DATABASE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, FOR ANY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, MACHINE LEARNING OR NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SOFTWARE, ALGORITHM, METHODOLOGY AND/OR MODEL. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND MATERIALS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY’S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY’S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the credit rating process or in preparing its Materials. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $500 to approximately $5,300,000. MCO and Moody’s Investors Service also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Charter Documents - Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.” Moody’s SF Japan K.K., Moody’s Local AR Agente de Calificación de Riesgo S.A., Moody’s Local BR Agência de Classificação de Risco LTDA, Moody’s Local MX S.A. de C.V, I.C.V., Moody’s Local PE Clasificadora de Riesgo S.A., and Moody’s Local PA Calificadora de Riesgo S.A. (collectively, the “Moody’s Non-NRSRO CRAs”) are all indirectly wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiaries of MCO. None of the Moody’s Non-NRSRO CRAs is a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization. Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. Additional terms for India only: Moody’s credit ratings, Assessments, other opinions and Materials are not intended to be and shall not be relied upon or used by any users located in India in relation to securities listed or proposed to be listed on Indian stock exchanges. Additional terms with respect to Second Party Opinions (as defined in Moody’s Investors Service Rating Symbols and Definitions): Please note that a Second Party Opinion (“SPO”) is not a “credit rating”. The issuance of SPOs is not a regulated activity in many jurisdictions, including Singapore. JAPAN: In Japan, development and provision of SPOs fall under the category of “Ancillary Businesses”, not “Credit Rating Business”, and are not subject to the regulations applicable to “Credit Rating Business” under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan and its relevant regulation. PRC: Any SPO: (1) does not constitute a PRC Green Bond Assessment as defined under any relevant PRC laws or regulations; (2) cannot be included in any registration statement, offering circular, prospectus or any other documents submitted to the PRC regulatory authorities or otherwise used to satisfy any PRC regulatory disclosure requirement; and (3) cannot be used within the PRC for any regulatory purpose or for any other purpose which is not permitted under relevant PRC laws or regulations.  For the purposes of this disclaimer, “PRC” refers to the mainland of the People’s Republic of China, excluding Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan.